I'm still having trouble seeing why his critique got a faster, more decisive response from our Archdiocese than a priest's so-called "boundary issues", inappropriate contact with child regarded as short of "sexual abuse", did last year (see my April 20, 2013 post It depends on what the meaning of the word 'safe' is.) It's as if our Archdiocese regards figuratively stepping on the toes of its bureaucrats as worse than literally fondling our schoolchildren.
No comments:
Post a Comment